Logo

48
issue
48 (143) 2021

Green Transformation

Could EU taxonomy have a real impact on the construction industry? The opportunity ahead for a responsible construction sector

By Gleeds Polska Sustainability Department
Header gleeds logo   black

 

Taxonomy, n.

1.    The science or the technique used to make a classification.

2.    A classification; especially a classification in a hierarchical system.

As active market players, we may all observe that even though sustainability and corporate social responsibility are getting more common, many organisations still need to rethink their approach. The construction sector has great potential to help implement changes. It is time for us to start think about construction in a wider way – not only in the context of buildings, but also in the context of wider business operations.

Which investments deserve to be called sustainable?

Issues related to sustainability can be difficult to measure, therefore it has always been quite challenging to judge clearly which investments are unreservedly environmentally friendly and which do not deserve to be called so. Despite much discussion and various interpretations, there is no ‘one size fits all’ conclusion.

Why do we need legislative solutions in sustainability?

It is fair to say that what the industry needed previously was a tool that would allow us to systematise the sustainability issues for businesses. We had eco-certification systems to evaluate buildings and construction processes, the buildings themselves and the operational stages of a project.  These worked fairly well and their popularity has recently increased – but what about the rest of our sector’s performance?
The scale of climate change has forced governments to accelerate ongoing changes of businesses to be more sustainable, or even force sceptics to implement them, using the stick of legislative tools.

The EU, taxonomy and calling things what they are.

The Taxonomy Regulation was adopted by the European Commission in June 2020. Member states, the EU and market participants are obligated to start complying with the new requirements from December 2021.

It is intended to be a new tool which will help plan and report the transition to an economy that is consistent with the EU’s environmental objectives. The taxonomy disclosure obligations encourage the reporting of progress towards meeting screening criteria as well as reporting on their achievements (according to the final report of the technical expert group).

One of the main goals of the taxonomy regulation is to create a secured environment for investors, and to protect them from being taken in by so-called greenwashing. It will give us – as market participants and as consumers – a mutual, clear understanding of what actually is a sustainable business; it will keep us safe from being exposed to spurious information on ‘environmental friendliness’, and as a result, our social and business awareness will develop.
As there are organisations at different stages of green transition, the taxonomy regulation provides them with help to plan vital processes. Additionally, cross-border investments will be easier to carry out with mitigated market fragmentation, as the result of creating a unified classification system.
All of this means that the assumptions made by the new regulation aims to ensure a solid basis to direct capital flows towards genuinely sustainable investments.

Graphic of own design basing on the source: //ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/business_economy_euro/accounting_and_taxes/
documents/190618-sustainable-finance-factsheet_en.pdf

What are the advantages of implementing EU taxonomy for companies?

This will help companies to drive their sustainability principles and purpose forward. Taxonomy regulations will enable us to recognise truly sustainable entities from among others internationally, as one set of standards will relate to all the member states. Through prioritising the criteria set by the regulations, businesses will increase their appeal among investors.

Are there any risks of implementing EU taxonomy?

Taxonomy may be associated with certain risks, which can be mitigated or managed.

Over time, as we conduct more and more research, gain more and more experience, the current set of standards may quickly become obsolete and require redefinition. We therefore need to be aware of this, keep a close eye on the market and remain flexible while developing our adaptability.

On the one hand, flexibility is necessary, on the other hand, it may cause some instability or uncertainty among the entities it concerns. In addition, limiting flexibility to a minimum can lead to rules that are too rigid and difficult to fulfil, resulting in a slowdown or even a temporary blockage.

Additionally, the taxonomy is methodically based on the EU system of business categorisation (NACE), which differs from the way investment sectors and industry segments are typically defined; this might cause communication problems.

The implementation of the taxonomy regulation requires all participants to have good motivation and a willingness to compromise, but throughout this process it is important to remember what our goal is and how high would be the risk to be taken if we gave up or failed reducing the human destructive impact on the earth.

More in Green Transformation:

Green will be the new normal. A view of the new world - one that may be brave too?

By Dr Allan Lawrence, a director of Projects Beyond Borders has a doctorate in Environmental Botany awarded by the University of Greenwich and is a lecturer in social policy and business-related programmes


BPCC member, Projects Beyond Borders Ltd (PBB) is a micro-business based in the North of England that has been a member of BPCC for four years and like most fellow members is wondering about how to adjust to life after Covid-19, when that will be, or even whether the word ‘after’ even applies.

Role of courts in addressing the climate crisis

By Maja Frontczak, attorney, and Łukasz Ostas, trainee attorney, Gessel Attorneys at Law


COP26, the 2021 UN Climate Change Conference in Glasgow will be held for the 26th time. This, in itself, indicates that climate change is perceived among the international community as a threat to be treated seriously and monitored every year. Although the Paris Agreement (2015) is often regarded as a breakthrough in the fight for climate preservation, many take the view that enactment of the document has not been followed by sufficient action by the signatory states to limit global temperature increase to not more than 2ºC (or, optimally, 1.5 ºC).

Polish RES Tax Issues

By Dariusz Stolarek, partner, Tax Advisory Group, Dentons


The Polish renewable energy market, in particular that based on wind and solar power, has recently enjoyed a boom. This is the result of global trends, EU regulatory requirements and the government's decision to support green energy, after, to put it mildly, its initial conservative approach to renewable energy sources.

Sharing best British practice in renewable energy

By Michal Sobczyk, senior trade advisor at Scottish International Development, with Angelika Gronowska, senior political advisor, and Janusz Bil, director, Energy and Mining, British Embassy Warsaw


For all of us, 2021 will be a unique year. In November, the UK will build on its climate leadership as host of the UN Climate Change Conference (COP26) in Glasgow. As we are still recovering from the coronavirus pandemic, we have a historic chance to build back better and even more resilient through a clean recovery that unlocks growth and creates jobs in green technology.