Public Procurement Group


BPCC Public Procurement Group is aimed at senior managers from international businesses that have invested in Poland, and also at lawyers and consultants specialising in the field to speak freely about problems encountered with the public procurement process in Poland and to draw up suggestions for improving procedures and transparency to Polish decision-makers.

Contact:
Marta Rynkowska, BPCC Project Manager
Tel. 22 320 01 16,
email: This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it

 

 

 


M E M O R A N D U M

Two high profile international surveys suggest that high levels of corruption in Poland and low levels of economic freedom place the country near the bottom of the list of EU Member States, just ahead of Bulgaria and Romania (2007 Corruption Perceptions Index, Transparency International), and in 83rd place globally, behind countries such as Kenya and Nicaragua (2008 Index of Economic Freedom, Heritage Foundation and the Wall Street Journal). Corruption and a lack of transparent procedures is above all seen to occur in the context of public procurement.

The British Polish Chamber of Commerce, with 475 members from 15 different countries, wishes to improve conditions for foreign investors in Poland and also wants to improve the perception of Poland as an good country to do business in. To this end, the BPCC sets out comments concerning public procurement, raised at the British-Polish Public Procurement Forum, organised by the BPCC on 20 March 2008 in Warsaw.

Representatives of BPCC members from both Polish and foreign firms highlighted issues concerning the following areas:

  • Overly complex public procurement procedures and requirements; lack of binding decisions from employees of the Office of Public Procurement – inability to take a decision for fear of making mistakes or accusations of corruption – often block the process.
     

  • Price should not be the only criterion. The OPP should promote the principle of best value for money, which often means not simply choosing the lowest price at time of purchase. Of particular importance is increasing the number of tenders for innovative and environmentally-friendly services.

  • We suggest introducing the idea that at the stage of drafting the technical specifications for a tender, assuming this does not infringe the principle of competition, that an Open Technical Dialogue including all interested parties from the public sector and private-sector companies interested in participating in the tender. This would accepting criteria that reflect reality and are realistic and achieveable. The current procedures for a competitive dialogue should only be used in the most complex and technically-difficult tenders.
     
  • The issue of commercial proxy documentation needs an amendment to the current public procurement law. The proposition of an amendment to the current law should focus on determining the obligation to attach documents relating to commercial proxies, and also introducing the obligation to the ordering party to ask the contractor to confirm the activities of the commercial proxy without having to set out a defined time limit for the proxy.
     

  • Another issue that faces UK companies bidding for public tenders in Poland is the requirement for certification that has no direct equivalent in Britain, such as certificates stating that a company does not have payments outstanding to the tax authorities, social security or health funds, or that the company’s officers have no criminal record.
     

  • It is critical to the optimal absorbtion of EU structural and cohesion funds for 2007-2013 that a new approach to the issue of public procurement be implemented; otherwise there is a danger that a significant portion of the funds will remain unspent.

The BPCC, on the British experience and best practice, creating the Public Procurement Group, will undertake the support of innovative legislative solutions in this area.


Forum marks start of Chamber’s public procurement group

Public procurement is a significant issue for many BPCC members. Poland’s public procurement process is flawed and needs to be improved swiftly – not least to help absorption of EU funds in coming years.

The BPCC has set up a Public Procurement special interest group to form a regular forum at which representatives of the Polish government can meet to talk frankly with and listen to BPCC members about their concerns in this area.

The initiative was launched at a BPCC/BT/Control Risks forum in March, when concerned members met with senior public sector representatives to discuss the scope of the problem (late notification of tenders, technical specifications that favour one bidder, bidders from other EU states disqualified on trivial technicalities, the seemingly-endless round of appeals) and offered solutions to improve the process.

The forum’s first session gave a platform for the public sector to set the scene. Robert Dzierzgwa from the Ministry of Regional Development put the issue into the context of the largest transfer of money from the EU’s central budget to any Member State. “Poland will be receiving €67.3 billion from Brussels between now and 2015. The money has to be well spent to deliver the outcomes expected by Poland and the EU. There are two dangers – one, that the money will end up in the wrong places. Two, that the checks and balances to prevent that from happening will be so restrictive, that funds earmarked for Poland’s development will return to Brussels unspent.” One issue worrying delegates was that of ‘in-house tenders’, where a public sector body – such as a local authority – can avoiding putting a particular piece of work out to public tender because it is to be carrying out by a unit of that body. The European Court of Justice has ruled (largely as a result of pressure from trades unions protection public sector jobs) that even if there is a percentage of private sector capital involved in the ‘in-house’ entity, the work can go ahead without a tender notice.

Sorana Parvulescu and Hana Lesenarova from Control Risks outlined how the potential for corruption within the public procurement, and the steps that a private-sector body should take to minimise the risk of the tender slipping away for the wrong reasons. Based on Control Risks’ wide experience in the CEE region, the presentation focused on case studies of how often public tenders were skewed to favour insiders and what foreign investors can do to level the playing field.

“Poland’s rather dismal score on Transparency International’s Global Corruption Perception Index is largely based on distortions within the public procurement system. With a thriving free media and a business environment clear of organised crime, it is at the interface between the private and public sectors that corruption has been perceived to exist,” said Michael Dembinski, the BPCC’s head of policy.

“The forum was extremely encouraging as it showed clear signs that the Office of Public Procurement (UZP) is open to dialogue with the foreign investor community, and is prepared to listen to suggestions as to how best to improve procedures. The professionalisation of public procurement is essential. The UK’s experience – the Chartered Institute of Purchasing and Supply – a splendid example of best practice – needs to be transferred to Poland.

“This was not a one-off forum, rather a prologue to an ongoing special interest group consisting of our members who wish to make their voice heard and to influence improve the workings of the public procurement system in Poland”.

The first regular meeting of the BPCC’s Public Procurement Group took place at the British Embassy’s Commercial Section in Warsaw on 20 May, and was attended by 24 members representing the construction, transporting, consultancy and legal services sectors. Speakers were Wojciech Hartung, head of the European Law Department at the UZP and Grzegorz Lang, the Deputy Director of the Economic Regulations Department at the Ministry of the Economy. A Memorandum prepared by the Chamber as a summary of the Forum’s proceedings was presented to the UZP and to the Ministry of the Economy. The text of the BPCC’s Memorandum on Public Procurement is available on the Chamber’s portal (www.bpcc.org.pl/public_procurement_memorandum).

Geraldine McDermott, First Secretary Commercial at the British Embassy in Warsaw, told delegates how the Embassy can help with document compliance. When submitting documentation with a tender bid, bidders have to attach certificates stating that they are up to date with their tax, ZUS and health fund payments, and certificates that their directors have a certificate stating a lack of criminal convictions. Such certificates do not exist in the UK. Equivalents issued on behalf of the bidder by UK authorities are often questioned by the Polish public sector questions the authority of the issuer of the document. Ms McDermott explained how the Embassy can help in verifying the validity of a British equivalent certificate.

The next meeting of the BPCC’s Public Procurement Group takes place on 3 July at the and will focus on the issue of corruption. A speaker from Transparency International will put Poland into a global context in this regard and will offer practical advice about winning tenders without resorting to unethical practices.

* More information and details of forthcoming BPCC work in the public procurement area from: Marta Rynkowska ( This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it )

 
polska wersja
Lost Password? No account yet? Register
Members directory
AdvertisementAdvertisement  
Copyright © 2008 by BPCC
Imperial Tobacco